War drums are beating India and Pakistan for the third time in 10 years, while the world eagerly looks at.
As atomic-cosmes engage in rival attacks and reversal, it is a good idea of how things have been played in recent times, and evaluate whether the policy of vengeance of India’s muscles is working.
India has fought to prevent terrorist attacks from across the border in the disputed Kashmir region for decades.
Although Pakistan has always denied participation in these events, but in India and internationally deaf ears, in view of the country’s self-approved history to support terrorism in Kashmir.
India’s relations with their north-western neighbor have been killed by repeated attacks with terrorists for decades.
Many times, the attacks came when the two governments tried to hold peace talks and normalize relations, forcing India to give up the efforts.
Prior to 2014, under gradual governments, India followed the policy of restraint.
Government of India pressurized itself to respond to terrorism strongly ,Roots,
When there was an attack by terrorists, killing soldiers or citizens, India will take a large extent diplomatic action, such as suspending dialogues, expelting diplomats and issuing public condemnation.
But military action under nuclear umbrella was considered very risky.
Pakistan’s problem affected India’s domestic politics.
The desire to strongly respond to these attacks became a central plank in Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s election campaign in 2014 and beyond.
After the years of Indian self-controls witnesses, most of its people believe that the risk of increasing war is worth it-because no country can absorb terrorist attacks forever.
Under Shri Modi’s government, India chased a bold new policy against cross-border terrorism in Kashmir-one where it is not afraid of moving forward.
So, how has these struggles incited by terrorism played under the new strategy?
2016: ‘Surgical Strike’
In September 2016, 19 Indian soldiers were killed by the terrorists of the Pakistan-based group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM).
The attackers hit an army brigade headquarters in Uri city in the morning.
The Government of India was under pressure to retaliate.
In response, India started a “surgical strike” in Pakistan controlled in Pakistan, which was considered a serious growth.
In 2016, nineteen Indian soldiers were killed by terrorists in the URI attack. ,Reuters: Mahesh Gupta,
It claimed that the “number of significant casualties” was dealt with “terrorist launch pads” along the actual limit, but never officially issued numbers.
Pakistan denied such an intrusion, claiming that only small arms fire was exchanged on the border, and two of its soldiers were killed.
Several news outlets jumped the gun, stating that Commandos had crossed the line of control, dividing the disputed Kashmir region between India and Pakistan, and killed a large number of terrorists after aircraft from helicopters.
Independent analyst and Reports In later days, it was suggested that limited action was crossed the border with the ground forces, and did not enter the Pakistani region deeply.
The Indian opposition politicians came out then and said that the attacks were not really different what previous governments had done, they were not widely publicized yet.
But the publicity was part of the new strategy to deal with terrorists in Shri Modi’s strong language.
In this new formulation, India did nothing to stop the “soft” reactions to cross -border extremism, such as suspension of dialogue and condemning, to prevent future attacks.
With these “surgical” attacks, something was done to see public hunger.
2019: Increase for air strikes
In 2019 again, Jame militants attacked a convoy of vehicles carrying Indian security personnel in Pulwama city of Kashmir.
Forty personnel were killed by four terrorists crossing the border.
This time, India replied with more force than before: it launched deep airstrikes in the Pakistani region for the first time after its 1971 war, dangerous to international observers.
India claimed that it had killed Jame’s “biggest training camp”, and had killed a very large number of terrorists, trainers and “groups of jihadis”.
Pakistani troops patrolled the area near Balakot after India’s air strikes in 2019. ,Reuters: Akhtar Somro,
While the government did not provide figures, the Home Minister of India put a number on 250 during a speech at an election rally.
Aerial attack was praised as a strong message for Pakistan in the Indian media. But there was a bottleneck.
Pakistan launched an anti -anti -anterior anteriuric in Indian territory the next morning, capturing an Indian pilot after an aerial dogfite.
It was an ignorant development for the Government of India, which uninterrupted themselves as a better military power.
Pakistan eventually handed back the pilot to India, which after its very publicized possession, giving a face-saving measures to the two countries, they could declare victory to each, and the struggle was abolished.
Independent analysts, including the Foreign Policy Think Tank Australian Strategic Policy Institute, later said that India’s Balkot Air Strike had little evidence to kill a large number of people, but suggested that it was a deliberate decision to avoid moving forward.
In the elections to be held after this, Shri Modi’s party was rewarded with a landslide victory.
2025: missiles in Pakistani region
On 22 April, four militants attacked most Hindu tourists in Kashmiri city of Pahalgam, killing 26 Indian citizens and a Nepali.
India blamed Pakistan -backed militants for the attack and 15 days later, nine sites in Pakistan and part of Pakistan in Kashmir.
This considered the response as “non-esclery” because it only hit “terrorist infrastructure”.
The Government of India hit a deep hit in the Pakistani region compared to before, attacking nine sites, although it did so with its own airspace.
This week, fake news and disintegration online have reached a fever-picker.
Pakistani and Indian news channels and social media accounts are posting videos of attacks and attacks from the previous conflicts, redeeming the global interest, each, each, carried forward a nationalist agenda.
Fact-cakers such as Indian outlet Alt News are arguing these posts as they prolify, who are trying to keep a carriage on fearful and chest.
The fake news emanating from both countries and the huge amounts of uneven claims make a sensible reading of risks.
On 7 May, an Indian missile strike hit an Indian missile strike in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Kashmir, administered by Pakistan. ,Reuters: Akhtar Somro,
India showed footage at a press conference, showing the goal of its missiles in the Pakistani region, showing the “terrorist infrastructure”.
Jame chief Masood Azhar himself came out and said that 10 members from his family, including children, were killed in Indian attacks, while Pakistan claimed 31 civilian casualties.
India denied that any citizen was killed.
In response to India’s attacks, Pakistan claims that it has demolished five Indian aircraft as the two countries excluded it from their own airplanes to the sky.
India has not yet addressed the claim, adding general confusion, but the US and French authorities have confirmed Reuters and CNN that at least one Indian aircraft has fallen down.
In the last few hours, each side claimed that the other launched the drone attacks in its area, which both say that was successfully canceled.
It’s loading …
It is engaged in drone war for India and Pakistan for the first time.
The situation keeps moving forward, as the report emerges to take action to both terrorists through missile attacks and air operations against the other.
It can last in this vein for days.
Has military vengeance stopped terrorism in Kashmir?
The Government of India’s policy around vengeance, despite the risk of increasing war in war, was partially based on the idea that it would prevent terrorist attacks from across the border.
And the terrorist attacks India that India has carried out in a military rule has responded to the military manner that India has not only made attacks that have faced India.
The data of deadly people from terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir from South Asia terrorism portal in New Delhi indicates a complex picture.
In 2001, from the height of more than 4,000 deadly people per year, the number in recent years is less to 100-200-a sharp drop.
He started falling continuously in 2002, and continued on that trajectory for 11 years, falling until 121 in 2012, Mr. Modi two years ago.
This was the lowest level since 1990.
Executive Director of South Asia Terrorism Portal, Dr. Ajai Sahni said, “The reason for this is a change in the international environment after 9/11.”
“Americans carried out thousands of drone attacks on terrorists and terrorist camps in Pakistan, Pakistan was under great pressure,” he said.
The Modi government came to power in 2014, and the numbers started back to 452 in 2018.
In 2023, sat at 127 in 2024, again the ambusions fell.
The data has little indication that the new policy of military vengeance of the Government of India for terror in the last 11 years has directly or indirectly affected numbers.
Sahni said that a separate strategy has an impact in bringing numbers down since 2023.
“A positive policy was that [the government] Started prosecuting people associated with terrorism. There was prosecution not only to the primary acts of terrorism, to convenience terrorists, to convenience terrorists, to concentrate with terrorists, “he said.
Supporters of the Muscular Indian Policy say that its purpose is not only to reduce the number in the short term, but to create adequate political pain and embarrassment in the long run, that its leadership is forced to give up its support of terrorism.
But whether Pakistan is being embarrassed on the global platform is clear.
The lack of clarity around the nuances of these battles leaves a question in the world’s mind, which has actually come out at the top.
All this leaves India in a difficult situation.
It’s loading …
Decades of restraint in front of deadly terrorism instigated the Indian population, which helped to bring the ruling party to power.
Now, more than a decade of vengeance has given a large part of the public that they wanted, but it comes with the risks of severe growth, and sometimes there is more investigation by the international community.
For a country that wants to focus on its game for its competition and great power status with China, India Pakistan may not seem to get out of Quality.
Load
