Hindi ‘Thopa’ line: PIL for the direction of TN, West Bengal and Kerala to implement SC Nap

The three-language formula under the NEP was heard on the allegations on the allegations of the formula of Hindi and Tamil Nadu chief Stalin’s firm protest.

A bench, including Justice JB Pardwala and Justice R. Mahadevanobsverv, said that the court cannot issue any direction in any direction to force any state to adopt NEP under Article 32 of the Constitution.

Refusing to entertain the PIL, the bench said: “Whether states should adopt the National Education Policy 2020, it is a disgusting issue. Through Article 32 of the Supreme Court, the Constitution, instructions can be issued to ensure that the rights of citizens are protected. It can motivate any state to adopt a policy.

“We do not propose to investigate the issue in this writ petition. We believe that the petitioner has nothing to do with this reason that he proposes aspoz. Although he can be from the state of Tamil Nadu, yet on his own entry, he is residing in New Delhi. Under such circumstances, this petition has been rejected.”

Initially Justice Pardwala asked Salah Mani: “Who are you? How are you worried about the National Education Policy?”.

The response was “I am from Tamil Nadu and now settled in Delhi, Mani said that due to” such policy “(Tamil Nadu School is not teaching Hindi), he could not easily learn Hindi.

“Then learn Hindi in Delhi now, isn’t it?” Justice Pardwala told Mani.

Tamil Nadu currently follows a two -language policy, which only teaches Tamil and English in schools.

According to the pilot, Stalin’s approach is against the fundamental right to false, arbitrary, politically motivated and independent and effective education.

“Although this honorable court usually does not have a direct power to accept a state government to accept the policy and force an official memorandum (MoU). However, it has the right to issue order direction to the state governments in cases where constitutional provisions or laws are violated, and they can force the state government, under some circumstances, under some circumstances.”

The argument states that the states are subject to a constitutional and legal obligation to implement NEP and enter an MoU for it.

Mani has also argued that the policy does not mention anything about installing Hindi in states.

This petition is being filed as all the state government and the central areas have implemented the scheme. But states like Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal neither implemented nor signed the MoU with the Central Government nor accepted the National Educational Policy 2020.

In cases like Food Security Law, Right to Information Act, Lokpal Bill, Education and Environment and Animal Welfare Issues, this is the honorable court, which has passed an order or direction to the wrong state government to implement the Center Act, which includes large public fundamental rights, said Pilot.